|
Post by ProkAdama on May 10, 2012 14:27:47 GMT
You won't find the answer in hell, you'll find it with me. It was directed towards the aircraft numbers, I knew you would question it.
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 10, 2012 14:34:51 GMT
You won't find the answer in hell, you'll find it with me. It was directed towards the aircraft numbers, I knew you would question it. *Mutters something* Whatever, anyway this is a superbattleship and like always you have to buy any aircraft on it and in this ships case any smaller combat vessels she is carrying. (Things like RIB's, Non combat-ROV's ect do not count in cost)
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 10, 2012 14:36:26 GMT
Okay, I'll calculate the price (Including the Zubr and planes) later on.
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 15, 2012 17:08:23 GMT
(Click for Hi-Def)WIP of the Fort Wocem Class Homeland Defense Base. Fort Wocem is a very large reinforced steel and concrete structure that has both a surface base and then underground facilities. Acting as both a Coast Defense station and a Multi-purpose defensive position Fort Wocem is VERY heavily armed. 27x Trident II ICBM's in silo's + spares kept in underground facility. Nuclear Capable, 12 MIRV Warheads at maximum per missile. 4x 155mm Guns 24x Casemate guns (Roughly 6" at a guess?) 4x RIM-2 Terrier SAM positions 8x Tomahawk Anti-Ship Cruise Missile launchers Radar position: Sensors and processing systems: SAMPSON multi-function air tracking radar (Type 1045) S1850M 3-D air surveillance radar (Type 1046) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S1850MType 965M Radar. Plus others i can't name
|
|
|
Post by number4 on May 16, 2012 13:31:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by IcyNudibranch on May 16, 2012 13:49:48 GMT
You would probably need to find out the maximum range. Nikola Tesla had a lot of good ideas, but many he didn't actually build or didn't work.
|
|
|
Post by number4 on May 16, 2012 14:03:04 GMT
I would assume ~200km.
|
|
|
Post by IcyNudibranch on May 16, 2012 14:07:10 GMT
Was it actually tested and proved to work at that range? That seems incredibly long.
|
|
AgentFawkes
Leader of the DPR
Operative Anton Kyznetsov
Posts: 1,057
|
Post by AgentFawkes on May 16, 2012 14:13:39 GMT
Was it actually tested and proved to work at that range? That seems incredibly long. Tesla was a f**king genius, and the Teleforce managed to get some Tungsten to travel at Mach 48. Which is damn near enough for 200km :l
|
|
|
Post by number4 on May 16, 2012 14:17:58 GMT
"Tesla gave the following description concerning the particle gun's operation: [The nozzle would] "send concentrated beams of particles through the free air, of such tremendous energy that they will bring down a fleet of 10,000 enemy airplanes at a distance of 200 miles from a defending nation's border and will cause armies to drop dead in their tracks".[10]"
The Wiki pages for both Particle Beam Weapon and Teleforce suggest he was able to get a prototype working, but like most Tesla projects, noone really knows for sure.
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 16, 2012 14:37:23 GMT
I'm sticking to nukes for now.
|
|
|
Post by IcyNudibranch on May 16, 2012 14:41:20 GMT
Yeah, I'll stick with SAMs. If anything, it would only really be useful as a permanent emplacement to defend borders, as it'd also require a massive power source, like a small, dedicated nuclear reactor.
|
|
AgentFawkes
Leader of the DPR
Operative Anton Kyznetsov
Posts: 1,057
|
Post by AgentFawkes on May 16, 2012 14:47:09 GMT
The particle bean has the decent advantage of not irradiating your homeland you fought so hard to protect
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 16, 2012 14:51:00 GMT
You can fire them at a location where the debris will travel towards ocean in right wind/geography. For example firing a nuke into eastern Ural mountains will make the debris travel east (perhaps north) into the arctic ocean; and firing one into the place where Emb wanted to invade will simply take the debris to Alaska in the right conditions.
|
|
AgentFawkes
Leader of the DPR
Operative Anton Kyznetsov
Posts: 1,057
|
Post by AgentFawkes on May 16, 2012 15:17:41 GMT
For the purpose of balancing nukes, I think all the radiation stays in the impact zone, but I'm not the person to make that decision.
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 17, 2012 2:03:25 GMT
|
|
Sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Admin Acc
Posts: 3,288
|
Post by Sgtsammac on May 17, 2012 3:03:42 GMT
how does it rate for defenses? I'm looking at around 5k based purely on offensive qualities.
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 17, 2012 10:32:50 GMT
Just that this guy... Suvorov B-334 by VladimiprokhorPutizakharovVLG, on Flickr ...cost 60k. It isn't very well at defence; the armament is shown in the picture; all it has for self-defense is a guided ATGM rack (AT), an HMG (Anti-Personell) and a twin gatling equipped with a large SAM rack (Anti-Air). This probably would bring up the cost to around the cost of 10k IMO, due to it's added large UAV launcher and VLS system. However, the lesser armed version should be around 4k, the vehicles pretty much have mostly RP purposes and it is armed with only an HMG, UAV Launcher and a guided ATGM rack.
|
|
|
Post by IcyNudibranch on May 17, 2012 16:18:02 GMT
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 17, 2012 16:22:10 GMT
I would like a price readout on my mobile radar. I'm thinking maybe $1200. Technically radar can be considered RP Value, although now stealth aircraft are around i guess it would help to have a cost on radars because they are going to become more and more useful in the way of detecting stealth aircraft. So yea, 1.2k sounds good for radars imo.
|
|
|
Post by IcyNudibranch on May 17, 2012 16:43:32 GMT
Alright, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by IcyNudibranch on May 20, 2012 3:05:14 GMT
I think this would go along the same lines as Ember's COUGAR and TIGER squads, but I'd like to run it by everyone first. Federation Templar by IcyNudibranch, on Flickr LMG-carrying armored heavy infantrymen, selected only from the best of the best. Not just brutes, though, also very smart. I'd be willing to pay for the gun and the suit, with the suit costing as much as a tank or something. I don't want to have a ton of them; no more than 50 or 100 if I were at full army capacity, which would have about 100000 infantry in it.
|
|
|
Post by IcyNudibranch on May 21, 2012 4:48:14 GMT
I'm going to suggest the price of $1000 for one suit of armor, plus I have to buy the weapon. It'll either be an LMG or a rocket launcher at this point, but I might come up with something else.
|
|
shark
Battle Mod
You can't always do what's right. You can always do what's left.
Posts: 1,167
|
Post by shark on May 21, 2012 8:26:45 GMT
^unless you've constructed the armour out of compressed cocaine I don't see how it could possibly cost as much as an APC.
|
|
AgentFawkes
Leader of the DPR
Operative Anton Kyznetsov
Posts: 1,057
|
Post by AgentFawkes on May 21, 2012 10:09:17 GMT
Has anyone tested the ballistic stopping capabilities of cocaine? I see a potential market here...
Nah, Icey, it'll likely cost HALF that at most.
|
|
|
Post by IcyNudibranch on May 21, 2012 13:59:25 GMT
Okay, so $500, plus a weapon. Thanks.
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 29, 2012 15:27:32 GMT
gyazo.com/a8534302a4c7990c8fa1c895345fc10bCross between a Catamaran and an mobile Oil Rig. Main Purpose: Radar platform/Air Defence Platform Onboard Weaponry: SAM's CIWS' Long Range AA Missile launchers Carried units: Royal Marines Helicopters Fighter Aircraft. (CAT's System) Small patrol boats.
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 29, 2012 17:20:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 29, 2012 18:10:09 GMT
I think that shouldn't cost anymore than a regular carrier, IMO. Doesn't seem to have much more ability other than a carrier. Also, yer using the vanilla Osprey? Shame on you, I hope you make your own version Nice job!
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 29, 2012 18:14:12 GMT
I think that shouldn't cost anymore than a regular carrier, IMO. Doesn't seem to have much more ability other than a carrier. Also, yer using the vanilla Osprey? Shame on you, I hope you make your own version Nice job! I just wanted to have something quick and simple to throw on... I will be doing my own later , i am keeping the designation though Personally i am pricing it at 300k because of the expanded AA capability and due to size and the fact it can act as an offshore base... however the purpose built offshore base is gonna be 700-800k.
|
|