|
Post by ProkAdama on Apr 6, 2012 13:27:45 GMT
Anyway the plane losses don't worry me, I'm quite rich now and I can buy them all over again.
I won't buy MiGs though, since they have just been proven obselete.
|
|
Sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Admin Acc
Posts: 3,288
|
Post by Sgtsammac on Apr 6, 2012 16:24:25 GMT
I think you missed something here. Buy a few. If you go pure maneuverability and 4 sends bombers your way that you can't catch because you had no interceptors, I won't feel sorry for you. A good airforce has all its bases covered.
And remember, you can strap missiles to your MiGs in a few weeks and they'll be perfect again.
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on Apr 6, 2012 16:28:11 GMT
Missiles change everything, don't they.
|
|
|
Post by number4 on Apr 6, 2012 18:12:37 GMT
Who said I was invading anyone? I've decommissioned my Hawks, and the rest of my forces are now on home defense.
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on Apr 6, 2012 18:44:18 GMT
No one said anything. Hypothetically if you did invade me again I would need both types of planes.
|
|
shark
Battle Mod
You can't always do what's right. You can always do what's left.
Posts: 1,167
|
Post by shark on Apr 7, 2012 6:45:57 GMT
I've got 2 ideas, and I'm too lazy to build them if I can't work out a tactical advantage to cost ratio ha ha. 1: Tiny subs. 1-2 man submarine, capable of carrying only a couple torpedos. Preferably, these would be priced similar to small boats. 2: Submarine Carrier. A huge, slow, mobile HQ for said tiny subs. It would have limited armaments and would mainly serve to resupply and house tiny subs for long range missions.
|
|
shark
Battle Mod
You can't always do what's right. You can always do what's left.
Posts: 1,167
|
Post by shark on Apr 7, 2012 10:40:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pmgsnipes on Apr 7, 2012 14:07:55 GMT
Of course, it is for around 2020.
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on Apr 7, 2012 14:11:05 GMT
I'm guessing it's 6th gen?
Then it's right in time for the 6th gen fighter auction.
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on Apr 8, 2012 7:46:50 GMT
$125,000 per unit, and you still have to pay for fighters.
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 1, 2012 21:08:05 GMT
Now to unveil the biggest WMD yet. gyazo.com/d0f42d80d59e36e0803db9918d62463c (Cutaway view of a WIP. 76x Pegasus 3 ICBM's (2x rows of 38) 10x Nuclear Warhead MIRV vehicles per missile. 760x Warheads possible carried per ship. (Obviously conventional or any CBRN warhead is possible) How much per ship?
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 1, 2012 21:15:42 GMT
Talking about EXTREME unconventional.
Do you know how much one ICBM costs? Now multiply that by 76...
Now put that all on one ship, then watch that one ship blow up. A big blow to the moral of the UDKA, it's only WMD of WMDs destroyed.
Spectacular explosion however.
What I mean is, it's just stupid to put it all on one ship. Rather use that nice little missile cruiser of yours, send a few of those.
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 2, 2012 5:17:34 GMT
When did i say i was actually going to use it? Or use them all at once?
Its also called this little thing called individual Silo's which would funnel the blast through multiple vents into the ocean Dissipating the missiles exhaust whilst multiple bouyancy tanks will adjust waterlevels during the launching and prior to it to keep the vessel stable.
|
|
|
Post by IcyNudibranch on May 2, 2012 5:24:43 GMT
I don't think it's so much about whether or not the ship is feasible, but whether or not it is practical. Nuclear weapons are really more a deterrent than anything, and having a ship filled with them is just asking for trouble. Ballistic missile submarines are an exception because they can hide fairly well, and even then, they only carry 18-24 missiles. And any ship can be sunk or destroyed, and then you lose not only your investment in the ship, but also the missiles you haven't already launched.
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 2, 2012 5:35:33 GMT
Yes i know that, this ship was just an idea of boredom and for the S+G's i was mainly just making a military heavy lifter out of the MV Blue Marlin and then someone said ICBM platform and i made a version, its never actually going to be used and its not just a nuclear weapon carrier it can hold any warhead and multiple types of missile/rocket,
Say... give it a new silo and it can hold rockets designed for launching stuff into space.
|
|
|
Post by IcyNudibranch on May 2, 2012 5:37:15 GMT
That seems like a really awesome idea. I'm thinking of drafting a nuclear non-proliferation and reduction treaty or something like that for the game anyways. Maybe once we get into the 80s.
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 2, 2012 5:40:00 GMT
Fair play to you, although didn't TREX have something like that between them and that they are trying to enforce via military action? Well.. were trying to enforce. gyazo.com/d286b1dd17b81e8a18e9f67c791cab79Here is the non-WMD Black Dolphin class.
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 2, 2012 10:28:56 GMT
Ah, this ship simply reminds me of those huge LRAM tanks a few months ago.
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 2, 2012 15:07:41 GMT
Its a real ship though. MV Blue Marlin / Black Marlin, Except mine is in Naval colours with a few guns.
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 2, 2012 20:36:50 GMT
I mean with the WMDs.
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 5, 2012 0:35:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 8, 2012 15:06:46 GMT
So, can anyone please give me the pricefor this VLS system? Please?
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 8, 2012 15:22:35 GMT
60k per unit.
And for my Black Dolphin WMD about 400k.
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 8, 2012 15:25:59 GMT
Okay. Sounds pretty reasonable, however I must remind you it might just be more efficient to send a ship in with the same VLS systems and cheaper. Also, nuclear air-to-air missiles, used on interceptors? Does that sound fine? It's a small nuke, like a Genie. It cannot cause any damage to ground under it; that has been tested with the Genie. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIR-2_Genie
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 8, 2012 15:28:20 GMT
Okay. Sounds pretty reasonable, however I must remind you it might just be more efficient to send a ship in with the same VLS systems and cheaper. You got your price so yea.. just no need to continue. If your refering to my BD WMD i know it would be more bleeping efficient to use other boats, why do you think i bleeping made the helmsman class. Yes the missiles will be allowed, but they will be tightly regulated by mods.
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 8, 2012 19:52:18 GMT
Only Air to Air, nothing else. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 10, 2012 1:52:04 GMT
|
|
sgtsammac
Ruler of the United Kingdom
Death to the kingdoms enemies.
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by sgtsammac on May 10, 2012 5:19:22 GMT
Thats pretty much a super battleship and will cost you about 400k
However i personally feel that you have gone OTT with the numbers for the airforce.
However like always you still need to purchase all the aircraft it carries and the boats it carries unless said boats are RP vaue (RIB's landing craft ect)
|
|
|
Post by ProkAdama on May 10, 2012 10:17:28 GMT
Yes, I know. And it actually is legit numbers, I based the numbers off of the American OGW which had all the stats. And this one is bigger.
|
|
|
Post by sgtsammac School on May 10, 2012 11:06:26 GMT
If you know what it is going to be then why the hell did you post it in special projects where you are meant to post things that DO NOT fit the criteria so as they can be priced.
|
|